Strange Musings Of An Estranged Lizard: Futanar, But...Male?
This is my first post, but not my first cronologically. I have many stories I have had planned to be posted here, but am only getting to them now. As such, take this, but remember there will be more.
My "Estranged Musings" series will be a place where I take a look at some of the more complex aspects of furry writing, porn, or things of Lewd-elia in general.
Here I talk about Futanari, and the concept of if there were male Futanari's.
I want to talk about the idea of futanari, in that I had an idea about it recently. Depending on how indepth you get with the concept, there's three subdevisions,
Hermaphrodite: A person with both male and female parts, but all of them, so vagina, penis, balls, breasts, etc.
Dickgirl: Which would be the idea of a girl with a penis and a vagina, but no balls,
And a Futa: A person with a dick, balls, and breast, but no vagina,
If you're wondering where I got this information, or where it comes from, it doesn't. I made this up. I simply noticed there were three names for the same thing, so I tried creating some subdivision between them as there are some differences.
But onwards to my main point.
Within mythology, a Hermaphrodite was not a male or a female, but a person who was in essence a combination of both at the same time, so they existed as both at the same time, or at least they existed as what ever you would get if you combined those two things. But in literary terms, Dickgirls and Futas are almost Universally Female, as in it is accepted that they are female, and simply have a dick and or balls along with their vagina. This, in contradiction, is entirely perception. A true Hermaphrodite is neither Male or Female, rather possessing traits -all of them- from both of the two. So the perception that Futas or Dickgirls are females, is wrong, or, sort of. Technically there's nothing wrong with the idea itself, an author can do whatever they want with their character, sort of. I'm simply conotating from the perspective of it's historicle origin. But stepping beyond history, and into fiction you truly can do whatever you want, so don't take my comment as a criticism.
But no one ever seems to literarily explore the opposite concept.
Ok, a girl with a dick. But what about a guy with breasts, or a guy with a pussy.
Now there is that second concept, there are cuntboys, something that I particularly dislike, but that is a matter of taste, so please don't be insulted. But that in itself is not the same thing. If in any depiction of art a futa can have both a vagina, penis, and balls, along with breasts, and it is accepted they are female, then why cant we have the same thing but opposite? A male with breasts, a dick, balls, and maybe a pussy.
This is not particularly an interest of mine, or even something I'm into, but it would be interesting to see -in a literary sense- what would happen. The typical appeal of Futa's tends to be that they are females with dicks. There's alot of domination themes in their porn, and many of them involve a male -often times smaller- being on the receiving end. So it can be clearly seen, that the ethos of the Futa, is one of a female with a dick, whom has domination over another male, and it is somehow that way that it is attractive. So how is it we can have the opposite?
What would be the themes of a male, who was known to be male, who had female parts. How would the porn look, but also what would be the mentality literarily speaking.
The appeal of Futa's often be's the fact that it's a woman with a dick, and in this case the dick is seen as the dominant artifact, as it is what does the penetrating, and the vagina, or asshole if your into futaXMale stuff, is the submissive artifact as it is what is penetrated. This is directly converse to femdom, where the vagina would be seen as the dominant artifact as it is the one that is in control, and the dick would be seen as the submissive artifact as it is the thing being made to cum. As such we can see, even under my descriptions, there are differences, so please dont assume that I am saying this way of thinking is absolute, and this is what is submissive, and this is what is dominant, I am more so describing a thing.
But conversely, as I said, what would the male be? What would he be called, if a Futa is a female with a dick? And I know the full word is Futanari. But what would be the theme, and what would be the ethos> If the appeal, and the general world projected "around" the futa -as in the normal setting they are put into- is one of domination and that is in itself the appeal -a girl WITH a dick- then what would happen to a guy with breasts and a pussy? I dont think that it would necessarily be conversely the same thing, as in they male would then have to take a submissive role, and his vagina would give him even more ways to be subjugated, but I do think it would in some way be different than the Futa. If the Futa is empowered by the Dick, and is usually seen in the appeal of being dominant, although subFuta is a thing -often amoung other futas-, then what is the appeal, and the world "projected" around the Male "Futa"
Well, for one, are guys more attracted to him? Or are they put off by the fact that he has a dick? Do they assume that he is a futa, and this gives him some added protection, as they are afraid of him -not wanting to get their ass plowed-, or are male "futa's" common, and there for understood. Because this question needs to be asked 2-fold. What is the appeal people have to this kind of porn, and what would be the usual setting he's put in?
Because as I said, Futas tend to get put in a rather dominant setting.
As such, would the breasts and vagina give him a more submissive stance, would he conversly be more submissive and more fuckable> Or would it be something other than just the opposite?
Continuing onwards from my previous point, if on one end, the breasts and the vagina could make him more fuckable, or the breasts and the vagina could grant him some form of protection as others don't want to get their asses fucked, if they are -as the third option stated- accepted as a part of society, what would that aspect be?
If futa's are dominant ass and mind fuckers that do whatever they want, do male Futa's also have this sort of elevated status? Perhaps they hold their sex above others,willing to use their sex to get advantage over others, instead of fucking others in the ass, willing to let others fuck them to get things. They may hold this over other women, kind of like the house breaker trope of some futas or BBC porn, or perhaps they just hold it over men, and offer them sex in a sort of converse way to Futa's taking it?
Perhaps their a more homoginous look to it, offering males sex freely as their form of power play, but also having it over females. They would probably have normal sized penises, as Futa's tend to have massive penis's and can -though rarely- have normal sized other proportions. So it would be interesting to see male "Futa's" have exaggerated female parts, and USE those female part to their appeal. If a Futa walks it a room and just uses her penis as Dominant artifact, and forces you to have sex, would the male take a more submissive roll, willingly, and let other have sex with him. Would their be appeals to him having the perfect female body, in a way to how futa's typically give dialogues to having the perfect dick? Would there be reverse fem-dom, with the male futa using his body to control others? Very much like how your have revers man-dom in the form of futa-dom, with Futa powering over a male with her dick?
I don't know, but it would be interesting to see.
As always, this is Jaccob Notch's Mad Musings,